Skip to main content

NASAs mega moon rocket is unaffordable, according to accountability report

YouTube Video Thumbnail
NASA's Space Launch System, or SLS, rocket sits on a launchpad at Kennedy Space Center in Florida on November 3, 2022, ahead of the launch of the Artemis I mission, a successful uncrewed test mission completed last year. Sign up for CNN's Wonder Theory science newsletter. Explore the universe with news on fascinating discoveries, scientific advancements and more. CNN -- Senior NASA officials say that the agency's Space Launch System -- the massive rocket designed to propel its ambitious Artemis program to establish a base on the moon -- is "unaffordable," according to a report Thursday from the US Government Accountability Office. The report, which breaks down SLS program expenditures, makes the striking admission that senior NASA officials deem the rocket to be unsustainable "at current cost levels," and it criticizes what the GAO said is a lack of transparency into the program's ongoing costs. The report does not name which officials -- or how many -- at NASA made such claims. A spokesperson at NASA's headquarters did not immediately respond to a request for comment. However, the GAO report does state that NASA "recognizes the need to improve the affordability." "With input from NASA management, the SLS program has developed a roadmap outlining short-term and long-term strategies that it hopes will result in future cost savings," the report said. That plan includes efforts to "stabilize the flight schedule," increase efficiencies, "encourage innovation" and "adjust acquisition strategies to reduce cost risk," according to GAO. The SLS rocket is at the core of NASA's Artemis program, the agency's flagship effort to return humans to the surface of the moon later this decade that also involves various exploratory and science missions aimed at establishing a permanent lunar settlement. The first test launch of SLS, in a mission dubbed Artemis I, took off November 16 after years of delays. The mission, though behind schedule, was regarded as a spectacular success, setting NASA up to launch its first crewed test mission around the moon in late 2024. That's expected to be followed by Artemis III, the first attempt to return American astronauts to the moon since the Apollo program. But the Artemis I success has not insulated NASA from the program's critics. Government watchdogs, including the GAO and NASA's inspector general, have repeatedly blasted the space agency's SLS program in reports dating back to 2014, as the GAO spelled out in its latest documents. The GAO is an investigative branch of the US government charged with overseeing public spending. Much of the criticism levied by those watchdogs has focused on contracting issues, such as cost overruns with the SLS program's primary contractors. The watchdogs have also reported transparency issues, saying NASA has not given all-in cost estimates for scheduled Artemis launches or done enough to attempt to break down ongoing expenses for the program. The GAO report also noted that it had suggested to NASA in 2014 that the agency should "develop a cost baseline that captures production costs" for missions using SLS Block I -- or the first version of the rocket that is expected to pave the way for larger, more powerful versions in the development pipeline. But while NASA "partially concurred," the agency "has not yet implemented this recommendation," the GAO report said. The report found that the space agency "does not plan to measure production costs to monitor the affordability of its most powerful rocket." In addition to the nearly $12 billion already spent developing the SLS rocket, NASA asked for more than $11 billion in its most recent budget request to fund the program for the next four years, according to the report.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

No man wants to date me Lady with unique nose cries bitterly Video

A pretty lady has gone online to lament bitterly over her singlehood as she attributes the status to their unique of her nose. The lady named Ammie Sweeshy cried out over her situation since no man appears to be approaching her or making any romantic advances towards her because of her nose. She made this known in response to a question a curious netizen asked inquiring if she has a boyfriend. Ammie could be observed crying in the video because no man seems to want her or making any romantic move to sweep her off her feet. Some netizens tried consoling her as they note that she's still pretty regardless of the nose. @dawgtreyna said: "Funny enough the nose actually fits you. You are still a fine girl though." @THE FASTEST BAGGER said: "You're so beautiful, don't let what people say ruin you. I'm single in case you need a boyfriend, let me know." @Princesseron commented: "Don't worry, dear. Even those who have small noses, some don't...

Osho on Spontaneity

Osho on Spontaneity – Divine purity reduced to practical life means spontaneity Osho – Divine purity reduced to practical life means spontaneity. The spontaneous person is innocent. He has a quality that only children have, and that is the meaning of purity, innocence. He has the quality that animals have and the trees have and which man has lost. To be spontaneous means not to act out of the past, because out of the past is all cunningness, cleverness, calculation, arithmetic. When you act in the moment and it has no reference to your past, the action has a beauty, a purity – the same as a small child’s act. Whether he laughs or cries or goes into a tantrum or becomes angry, all his acts have purity – it is uncalculated. His anger is hot and not cold. The calculated anger is cold. His anger is natural, a responsiveness. He has not brooded over it, he has not planned it. He is just in the hands of nature – hence the beauty. He is surrendered to his nature; he is not trying to cont...

British victory in Falklands War might spur Argentina to build nukes CIA feared

Agency worried that Argentina's political isolation following defeat could play a role in a decision to advance its nuclear program The CIA feared that British victory in the 1982 Falklands conflict would encourage Argentina's ruling military junta to step up its efforts to construct nuclear weapons, according to a newly uncovered report. Intelligence analysts at the spy agency examining the issue of nuclear proliferation wrote in a secret report that "the Falkland Islands crisis is raising security issues for Buenos Aires that could influence Argentine attitudes towards the development of nuclear technology." The report, dated 24 April 1982, said: "A humiliation in the Falklands probably would encourage the conclusion that the possession of nuclear weapons - or merely the foreign belief that Argentina had such weapons - might have made the UK more accommodating. A major reverse for Argentina in the dispute could persuade it to proceed to build nuclear weapons....