Skip to main content

Biden is flailing, how Ukraine wins and other commentary

YouTube Video Thumbnail
The latest CNN poll shows that even 70% of Democrats "have serious concerns about whether Biden . . . is up to the job of president" and 67% "want a different candidate," one reason almost every major GOP candidate could beat him in "a head-to-head 2024 match up," notes the Washington Examiner's Byron York. When "the pollsters measured Biden against all of his major Republican would-be challengers," they "found that, while all the scenarios were close, the president could defeat only one of them -- Vivek Ramaswamy -- and then by just a single point." Nikki Haley had the biggest lead, 49% to Biden's 43%, a sign that word of her "strong performance" in the first GOP debate "is spreading in ways that were not measured in the quickie polls." Contra White House claims, President Biden's actions to reopen schools in early 2021 "were hardly 'swift,' " fumes Ingrid Jacques at USA Today. "His goal to fully open schools within his first 100 days quickly fizzled" as teachers unions "played an outsized role in dictating health and policy guidelines that kept schools shuttered far longer than necessary." Now "parents have newfound power in the wake of the COVID shutdowns" -- and they're "taking action when they don't like what their children's school is doing." "Whether it's decisions related to COVID or what schools are teaching, parents are no longer sitting on the sidelines." They're expanding "school choice," pushing "academics" and "defending their values." "Parents should remember what they've learned the past few years and keep fighting for their kids." The new Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression survey found that, even on campuses that protect free speech, many "have student bodies that aren't quite so tolerant," reveals Reason's Emma Camp. "Only one-third of college students say it's never acceptable to shout down a controversial campus speaker. And one-quarter think using violence can be acceptable in at least some circumstances to stop someone from speaking on campus." Of 55,000-plus students, 71% "agreed that a college 'definitely' or 'probably' should not allow a speaker on campus who previously expressed the idea that 'Black Lives Matter is a hate group.' " This "illustrates how difficult it is to change student's attitudes toward free speech" even when the school is sound. "The US and NATO need to give [President Volodymyr] Zelensky and his generals their due" and "modify and strengthen their support to Ukraine's fight" to ensure that Ukraine beats Russia, argue Jonathan Sweet & Mark Toth at The Hill. "The Russian way of fighting -- mass -- is succumbing to the Ukrainian way" of challenges on multiple fronts and including behind Russia's frontline. Ukraine's on the verge of at least one major breakthrough. But "winning the close fight -- the main effort -- will not win the war if Ukraine cannot exploit the breakthrough." "Unless the next tranche of aid translates into a precision deep strike capability -- namely ATACMS, an expedited F-16 pilot training and fielding plan, cluster munitions for its rockets, more artillery and engineering assets -- Ukraine will be forced to continue fighting its own deliberate timeline." "Within 25 years New York will find itself trying to manage the disposal of five million or more waste solar panels every year," reports the Empire Center's James E. Hanley. Yet the state "has no plan" to manage it. Current methods: Export them and their "numerous toxic metals" to developing countries." Stateside, they can go to "hazardous waste landfills," but often don't. "Most counties that operate landfills" say they have no "policies at all concerning the disposal of waste solar panels." Recycling would cost "as much as $135 million per year" -- and "much of the non-recoverable materials in solar panels" are "often incinerated after recycling." So pols need a real "plan to handle" NY's green waste.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

No man wants to date me Lady with unique nose cries bitterly Video

A pretty lady has gone online to lament bitterly over her singlehood as she attributes the status to their unique of her nose. The lady named Ammie Sweeshy cried out over her situation since no man appears to be approaching her or making any romantic advances towards her because of her nose. She made this known in response to a question a curious netizen asked inquiring if she has a boyfriend. Ammie could be observed crying in the video because no man seems to want her or making any romantic move to sweep her off her feet. Some netizens tried consoling her as they note that she's still pretty regardless of the nose. @dawgtreyna said: "Funny enough the nose actually fits you. You are still a fine girl though." @THE FASTEST BAGGER said: "You're so beautiful, don't let what people say ruin you. I'm single in case you need a boyfriend, let me know." @Princesseron commented: "Don't worry, dear. Even those who have small noses, some don't...

Osho on Spontaneity

Osho on Spontaneity – Divine purity reduced to practical life means spontaneity Osho – Divine purity reduced to practical life means spontaneity. The spontaneous person is innocent. He has a quality that only children have, and that is the meaning of purity, innocence. He has the quality that animals have and the trees have and which man has lost. To be spontaneous means not to act out of the past, because out of the past is all cunningness, cleverness, calculation, arithmetic. When you act in the moment and it has no reference to your past, the action has a beauty, a purity – the same as a small child’s act. Whether he laughs or cries or goes into a tantrum or becomes angry, all his acts have purity – it is uncalculated. His anger is hot and not cold. The calculated anger is cold. His anger is natural, a responsiveness. He has not brooded over it, he has not planned it. He is just in the hands of nature – hence the beauty. He is surrendered to his nature; he is not trying to cont...

British victory in Falklands War might spur Argentina to build nukes CIA feared

Agency worried that Argentina's political isolation following defeat could play a role in a decision to advance its nuclear program The CIA feared that British victory in the 1982 Falklands conflict would encourage Argentina's ruling military junta to step up its efforts to construct nuclear weapons, according to a newly uncovered report. Intelligence analysts at the spy agency examining the issue of nuclear proliferation wrote in a secret report that "the Falkland Islands crisis is raising security issues for Buenos Aires that could influence Argentine attitudes towards the development of nuclear technology." The report, dated 24 April 1982, said: "A humiliation in the Falklands probably would encourage the conclusion that the possession of nuclear weapons - or merely the foreign belief that Argentina had such weapons - might have made the UK more accommodating. A major reverse for Argentina in the dispute could persuade it to proceed to build nuclear weapons....