Skip to main content

Osho on Heaven and Hell

Osho on Heaven and Hell – Heaven is a state of being, it is a state of love

in OSHO INSIGHTS ON LOVE
Osho – Heaven is not something geographical, it is not something outside you, somewhere above the clouds; it is within you. The whole idea of a geographical heaven somewhere out there has led millions of people into all kinds of stupidities.

Heaven is a state of being, it is a state of love. When you are full of hate you are in hell, when you are overflowing with love you are in heaven. The English word ‘paradise’ comes from a Persian word ‘firdaus’. Firdaus means a walled garden with many flowers, streams, birds. That garden is your potential. Seeds are there, everything is there as a potential but you have to actualise it. God only provides seeds and the challenge of life to sow those seeds, to grow, to protect, to water, to nourish, to wait. And then spring comes and one day the mysterious has happened.

The seed has never given any clue as to what it contained; when suddenly lotuses bloom you cannot believe that they were hiding in such small seeds, in ugly seeds — closed, windowless. They almost look like small stones, pebbles — and such beautiful roses were hiding there. if you had cut open the seeds you would not have found anything.

That’s where science is missing: it goes on dissecting, cutting seeds and trying to find roses, lotuses, marigolds. It finds nothing, not even a hint, because the potential is invisible. It needs many things, only then can it become visible.

By becoming a sannyasin one is taking a step towards the actualisation of all the potential that has come with you from the very beginning. The potential should not die as a potential. That is the only sin, to have been living with such an opportunity and not to have used it. That’s the only sin. To have used it to its maximum, its optimum capacity, is virtue.

Source – Osho Book “I Am Not As Thunk As You Drink I Am”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

No man wants to date me Lady with unique nose cries bitterly Video

A pretty lady has gone online to lament bitterly over her singlehood as she attributes the status to their unique of her nose. The lady named Ammie Sweeshy cried out over her situation since no man appears to be approaching her or making any romantic advances towards her because of her nose. She made this known in response to a question a curious netizen asked inquiring if she has a boyfriend. Ammie could be observed crying in the video because no man seems to want her or making any romantic move to sweep her off her feet. Some netizens tried consoling her as they note that she's still pretty regardless of the nose. @dawgtreyna said: "Funny enough the nose actually fits you. You are still a fine girl though." @THE FASTEST BAGGER said: "You're so beautiful, don't let what people say ruin you. I'm single in case you need a boyfriend, let me know." @Princesseron commented: "Don't worry, dear. Even those who have small noses, some don't...

Osho on Spontaneity

Osho on Spontaneity – Divine purity reduced to practical life means spontaneity Osho – Divine purity reduced to practical life means spontaneity. The spontaneous person is innocent. He has a quality that only children have, and that is the meaning of purity, innocence. He has the quality that animals have and the trees have and which man has lost. To be spontaneous means not to act out of the past, because out of the past is all cunningness, cleverness, calculation, arithmetic. When you act in the moment and it has no reference to your past, the action has a beauty, a purity – the same as a small child’s act. Whether he laughs or cries or goes into a tantrum or becomes angry, all his acts have purity – it is uncalculated. His anger is hot and not cold. The calculated anger is cold. His anger is natural, a responsiveness. He has not brooded over it, he has not planned it. He is just in the hands of nature – hence the beauty. He is surrendered to his nature; he is not trying to cont...

British victory in Falklands War might spur Argentina to build nukes CIA feared

Agency worried that Argentina's political isolation following defeat could play a role in a decision to advance its nuclear program The CIA feared that British victory in the 1982 Falklands conflict would encourage Argentina's ruling military junta to step up its efforts to construct nuclear weapons, according to a newly uncovered report. Intelligence analysts at the spy agency examining the issue of nuclear proliferation wrote in a secret report that "the Falkland Islands crisis is raising security issues for Buenos Aires that could influence Argentine attitudes towards the development of nuclear technology." The report, dated 24 April 1982, said: "A humiliation in the Falklands probably would encourage the conclusion that the possession of nuclear weapons - or merely the foreign belief that Argentina had such weapons - might have made the UK more accommodating. A major reverse for Argentina in the dispute could persuade it to proceed to build nuclear weapons....